WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:02.399
The topics and opinions express in the following show are
2
00:00:02.439 --> 00:00:04.080
solely those of the hosts and their guests and not
3
00:00:04.120 --> 00:00:07.000
those of W FOURCY Radio. It's employees are affiliates. We
4
00:00:07.080 --> 00:00:10.160
make no recommendations or endorsements for radio show programs, services,
5
00:00:10.199 --> 00:00:12.519
or products mentioned on air or on our web. No
6
00:00:12.640 --> 00:00:15.519
liability explicit or implies shall be extended to W FOURCY
7
00:00:15.640 --> 00:00:18.320
Radio or its employees are affiliates. Any questions or comments
8
00:00:18.359 --> 00:00:20.559
should be directed to those show hosts. Thank you for
9
00:00:20.640 --> 00:00:23.440
choosing W FOURCY Radio.
10
00:00:28.280 --> 00:00:31.679
What's working on Purpose? Anyway? Each week we ponder the
11
00:00:31.719 --> 00:00:34.880
answer to this question. People ache for meaning and purpose
12
00:00:34.920 --> 00:00:38.280
at work, to contribute their talents passionately and know their
13
00:00:38.320 --> 00:00:41.679
lives really matter. They crave being part of an organization
14
00:00:41.759 --> 00:00:44.479
that inspires them and helps them grow into realizing their
15
00:00:44.560 --> 00:00:47.560
highest potential. Business can be such a force for good
16
00:00:47.640 --> 00:00:51.240
in the world, elevating humanity. In our program, we provide
17
00:00:51.280 --> 00:00:54.320
guidance and inspiration to help usher in this world we
18
00:00:54.359 --> 00:00:58.679
all want Working on Purpose. Now, here's your host, Doctor
19
00:00:58.679 --> 00:00:59.759
Relise Cortes.
20
00:01:04.439 --> 00:01:06.400
Welcome back to the Working on Purpose program, which has
21
00:01:06.799 --> 00:01:08.719
been brought to you with passion and pride since February
22
00:01:08.719 --> 00:01:11.120
of twenty fifteen. Thanks for tuning again this week. Great
23
00:01:11.159 --> 00:01:13.760
to have you. I'm your host, doctor Alas Cortes. If
24
00:01:13.760 --> 00:01:15.359
we have not met before and you don't know me,
25
00:01:15.400 --> 00:01:19.120
I'm an organizational psychologist and management consultant, logo therapists, speaker
26
00:01:19.159 --> 00:01:21.480
and author. My team and I at Gusta Now help
27
00:01:21.519 --> 00:01:24.640
companies to enligen and fortify their operations by building a dynamic,
28
00:01:24.719 --> 00:01:28.680
high performance culture and inspirational leadership activated by meaning and purpose.
29
00:01:29.000 --> 00:01:31.799
And did you know that inspired employees outperform their satisfied
30
00:01:31.799 --> 00:01:34.200
peers by a factor of two point twenty five to one.
31
00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:37.000
In other words, inspiration is good for the bottom line.
32
00:01:37.120 --> 00:01:38.359
You can learn more about us and how we can
33
00:01:38.400 --> 00:01:41.640
work together at gusto dashnow dot com or my personal
34
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:44.959
site at least Cortes dot com. Getting into today's program
35
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:47.319
we have with us today Doctor Thadius Metz, who has
36
00:01:47.439 --> 00:01:50.959
established himself for having helped to develop life's meaning as
37
00:01:51.000 --> 00:01:54.599
a distinct field of Anglo American philosophy and currently serves
38
00:01:54.640 --> 00:01:57.040
as a research professor at the University of Pretoria in
39
00:01:57.079 --> 00:02:00.239
South Africa. He is a prolific author, having published more
40
00:02:00.239 --> 00:02:03.879
than three hundred professional books, chapters and articles which include
41
00:02:04.239 --> 00:02:07.959
such as Meaning in Life and Analytics, Study God's Soul
42
00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:10.840
and the Meaning of Life and what makes life meaningful?
43
00:02:10.879 --> 00:02:11.360
A debate.
44
00:02:11.599 --> 00:02:14.800
He joined it today from pretorious, South Africa. Professor Metz
45
00:02:14.879 --> 00:02:16.280
Welcome to Working on Purpose.
46
00:02:17.319 --> 00:02:19.120
Hi, thanks for having me at least.
47
00:02:19.120 --> 00:02:22.360
It's wonderful to have you. I terribly enjoyed this book.
48
00:02:22.360 --> 00:02:24.159
I read it cover to cover as I always do,
49
00:02:24.199 --> 00:02:25.439
and a couple of the other things that you sent
50
00:02:25.479 --> 00:02:28.639
me as well. So I really applaud your work. And
51
00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:30.639
as I told you before we got on air, I
52
00:02:30.719 --> 00:02:32.840
went down the rabbit hole, and I mean, you really
53
00:02:32.879 --> 00:02:35.599
got me thinking about something. So I really appreciate your work.
54
00:02:36.159 --> 00:02:37.840
Oh that's hardening, glad to hear it.
55
00:02:38.159 --> 00:02:40.400
Yeah, so at least you've got at least one fan,
56
00:02:40.680 --> 00:02:44.479
we know that, right, terrific. I want to start with
57
00:02:44.520 --> 00:02:46.800
something that I think is pretty profound. Even the way
58
00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:49.159
you open the book, it's you know, you've situated the
59
00:02:49.199 --> 00:02:54.240
book as a debate between you and Professor Joshua Secris.
60
00:02:54.560 --> 00:02:56.479
And what I love about it that is, I love
61
00:02:56.560 --> 00:02:59.280
that it's one It's there's a playful banter, but there's
62
00:02:59.319 --> 00:03:01.560
a respect for banter. And what I also want to
63
00:03:01.599 --> 00:03:04.159
just call out, here is just how you really, you know,
64
00:03:04.280 --> 00:03:07.240
you you're showing us, you're modeling for us how to
65
00:03:07.280 --> 00:03:09.919
have a productive or respectful debate where you can completely
66
00:03:09.919 --> 00:03:13.199
disagree with each other on tremendous grounds, but then, as
67
00:03:13.240 --> 00:03:16.639
you say, afterwards, but then go have a beer together afterwards.
68
00:03:16.919 --> 00:03:18.680
I think that's the world we need right now, if
69
00:03:18.680 --> 00:03:20.039
you could please help us with that.
70
00:03:20.039 --> 00:03:24.319
That, Yeah, I think that's a that's a model, and
71
00:03:24.360 --> 00:03:30.639
it's a kind of meaningful engagement. I actually think you
72
00:03:30.719 --> 00:03:33.759
mentioned two things, a dialogue on the one hand, and
73
00:03:33.840 --> 00:03:37.680
searching for truth together in some kind of constructive way.
74
00:03:39.360 --> 00:03:41.800
And I think I don't think that's you know, I
75
00:03:41.800 --> 00:03:44.599
don't think meaning in life is completely a matter of
76
00:03:44.599 --> 00:03:47.919
those things. But when they're absent, we notice and there's
77
00:03:47.919 --> 00:03:51.479
something missing. And we see this in some of the
78
00:03:51.560 --> 00:03:56.039
images that philosophers use to capture a meaningless life. So
79
00:03:56.199 --> 00:03:58.919
Robert knowsick about fifty years ago he was a Harvard
80
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:03.719
philosopher lecturer there and he imagined that there was an
81
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:07.439
what he called an experienced machine, and you didn't have
82
00:04:07.520 --> 00:04:10.240
it's basically a virtual reality device, that's what we would
83
00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:12.560
call it these days. But there was no such thing
84
00:04:12.599 --> 00:04:15.479
fifty years ago, and he imagined that you could get
85
00:04:15.520 --> 00:04:22.560
into this device and it would simulate various activities, so
86
00:04:22.639 --> 00:04:25.240
you would think you're writing the great American novel, or
87
00:04:25.959 --> 00:04:28.680
suppose you're having a great romance, but you're not actually
88
00:04:28.720 --> 00:04:34.000
there doing that. You're fooled by the machine. And he
89
00:04:34.399 --> 00:04:37.040
came up with this thought experiment to suggest that while
90
00:04:37.040 --> 00:04:39.839
a life might be happy in such a machine, it
91
00:04:39.879 --> 00:04:43.120
would be missing some meaning. And part of the reason,
92
00:04:43.160 --> 00:04:45.680
he thinks, is that we would be isolated from each other.
93
00:04:45.759 --> 00:04:48.079
We would just be alone with the technology on the
94
00:04:48.120 --> 00:04:50.720
one hand, but we would also be deceived on the
95
00:04:50.720 --> 00:04:53.439
other We wouldn't be in touch with the truth. And
96
00:04:53.519 --> 00:04:56.040
so it looks like for many of us doing philosophy,
97
00:04:56.560 --> 00:05:01.120
meaning comes from coming together and in search of truths.
98
00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:04.040
That's part of what's going on in a meaningful life.
99
00:05:04.399 --> 00:05:08.759
It's really beautiful. I think it's important for us to distinguish.
100
00:05:08.839 --> 00:05:11.560
I mean, I think really anybody who's listening listening to
101
00:05:11.639 --> 00:05:14.319
us talk on this program today, certainly you can go
102
00:05:14.360 --> 00:05:17.639
a day without hearing two words meaning and purpose. But
103
00:05:17.959 --> 00:05:21.199
the way that you, both you and Professor Seacrest talk
104
00:05:21.240 --> 00:05:23.360
about meaning, So there's the meaning in life, which is
105
00:05:23.399 --> 00:05:25.879
the personal part of it, and then there's a meaning
106
00:05:25.959 --> 00:05:28.399
of light that's the cosmic part of things. So if
107
00:05:28.399 --> 00:05:30.439
you could distinguish a little bit for our listeners and
108
00:05:30.519 --> 00:05:35.360
viewers between those two very very distinct realms, there.
109
00:05:35.240 --> 00:05:39.040
Are really two questions here, two different questions. One is
110
00:05:39.160 --> 00:05:42.800
which life do we want to inquire about? Is it
111
00:05:42.800 --> 00:05:45.040
the life of an individual such as my life? Do
112
00:05:45.079 --> 00:05:47.160
I want to know whether my life is meaningful or
113
00:05:47.199 --> 00:05:50.639
how it is meaningful? That's one sort of question, you know,
114
00:05:50.839 --> 00:05:53.360
distinguishing between whether I want to know whether it's my
115
00:05:53.519 --> 00:05:55.639
life or whether it's the life of the human race
116
00:05:56.319 --> 00:06:01.079
or life anywhere to be found in the universe. That's
117
00:06:01.120 --> 00:06:04.240
one question, whose life are we interested in? But the
118
00:06:04.279 --> 00:06:09.279
second question is, given a choice of which life to evaluate,
119
00:06:09.759 --> 00:06:12.560
how do we appraise it? Do we appraise it from
120
00:06:12.600 --> 00:06:15.079
a sort of human point of view or do we
121
00:06:15.120 --> 00:06:19.319
take a very big cosmicpective, perhaps a god's eye point
122
00:06:19.360 --> 00:06:22.480
of view, and ask about the impact of that life
123
00:06:22.600 --> 00:06:28.879
on not merely those on earth, but potentially the universe
124
00:06:28.879 --> 00:06:34.160
as a whole. Most philosophers of life's meaning these days
125
00:06:34.240 --> 00:06:37.120
focus on the individual as opposed to the meaning of
126
00:06:37.160 --> 00:06:41.360
the human race. As a whole. And furthermore, when they
127
00:06:41.439 --> 00:06:43.920
evaluate the life of an individual, they tend to do
128
00:06:44.000 --> 00:06:49.079
it in terms from a human point of view, and
129
00:06:49.120 --> 00:06:52.600
so many of us treat the category of meaning in
130
00:06:52.639 --> 00:06:55.639
life as similar to inquiry into what makes a life
131
00:06:55.680 --> 00:06:59.399
happy or when is a body health? Those are about
132
00:06:59.399 --> 00:07:03.839
an individual, and they're not cosmic questions. They are questions
133
00:07:03.839 --> 00:07:07.279
about a life here on earth. And many of us
134
00:07:07.319 --> 00:07:09.879
think that when we're talking about meaning in life, we're
135
00:07:09.959 --> 00:07:13.000
talking about mainly something that's similar, a kind of value
136
00:07:13.000 --> 00:07:16.600
that's similar to happiness or health. And I think part
137
00:07:16.639 --> 00:07:19.480
of the reason for that is that when we get
138
00:07:19.519 --> 00:07:22.680
into cosmic questions, if we ask about what the point
139
00:07:22.839 --> 00:07:25.680
of humanity is, or if we ask about whether the
140
00:07:25.759 --> 00:07:29.399
human race has some role to play in the whole universe,
141
00:07:30.240 --> 00:07:35.160
it's hard to avoid invoking God as understood in the
142
00:07:35.439 --> 00:07:40.839
Abrahamic faiths. And relatively few professional philosophers claim to know
143
00:07:40.920 --> 00:07:46.199
that God exists. They might believe on faith, okay, but philosophers,
144
00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:48.800
you know, by definition, we're looking for evidence. We're looking
145
00:07:48.879 --> 00:07:51.600
for good reasons to believe one thing rather than another.
146
00:07:52.639 --> 00:07:56.600
And relatively few professional philosophers think we have a very
147
00:07:56.639 --> 00:08:00.199
solid case in terms of evidence that God exists, and
148
00:08:00.240 --> 00:08:04.040
so that's led many of us to focus on uh
149
00:08:04.360 --> 00:08:06.560
less cosmic questions, more earthly ones.
150
00:08:08.920 --> 00:08:11.360
So delightful that so wonderful to me too. And I
151
00:08:11.360 --> 00:08:13.879
think I remember which which book it was that I
152
00:08:14.000 --> 00:08:15.959
read about you, But I read a book every single
153
00:08:15.959 --> 00:08:18.480
week for my podcast. But so glad I found you,
154
00:08:18.519 --> 00:08:20.279
and so glad that you said yes, I'll come on
155
00:08:20.319 --> 00:08:24.759
your podcast with you very just chewy questions. So, given
156
00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:27.959
just how much there is to consider around just meaning,
157
00:08:28.040 --> 00:08:30.560
and I'm going to layer some information around that, or
158
00:08:30.600 --> 00:08:33.679
at least my perspective here in just a second. Now,
159
00:08:33.759 --> 00:08:36.480
let's let's just contrast that with purpose. How would you
160
00:08:36.559 --> 00:08:38.600
distinguish meaning from purpose?
161
00:08:41.039 --> 00:08:43.519
I think a lot of meaning in life is a
162
00:08:43.559 --> 00:08:47.000
matter of achieving a purpose. If I look at my life,
163
00:08:47.080 --> 00:08:50.519
I'm striving to teach my students something, i want to
164
00:08:50.559 --> 00:08:53.200
make a difference to my field. I want to rear
165
00:08:53.360 --> 00:08:57.639
my children with love and wisdom. I want my marriage
166
00:08:57.759 --> 00:09:02.679
to be strong, happy and so. And those are intuitively
167
00:09:02.759 --> 00:09:05.120
sources of meaning for me, where if I were able
168
00:09:05.120 --> 00:09:10.919
to achieve those purposes. But I think there can be
169
00:09:11.039 --> 00:09:14.759
ways of a life being meaningful that don't involve striving
170
00:09:14.799 --> 00:09:22.759
to achieve a goal. And I think one example, might
171
00:09:23.159 --> 00:09:28.799
hear a few examples. I think, if I love other people,
172
00:09:28.840 --> 00:09:31.519
I'm achieving a kind of purpose of my own. But
173
00:09:31.600 --> 00:09:35.720
if others love me, might not involve any goal directed
174
00:09:35.799 --> 00:09:39.120
activity on my part. Right, there's no striving on my part.
175
00:09:39.159 --> 00:09:43.360
It's something I receive. Or if I think of the
176
00:09:43.440 --> 00:09:46.799
life of Vincent van Go and I think of the
177
00:09:46.840 --> 00:09:50.720
recognition he received after he had died, you know, after
178
00:09:50.759 --> 00:09:53.480
he died, we suppose there wasn't any activity, There wasn't
179
00:09:53.480 --> 00:09:58.399
any striving to achieve a goal, but the influence of
180
00:09:58.440 --> 00:10:01.840
his art and the recognition he receive eat for it
181
00:10:01.879 --> 00:10:07.679
probably made his life, for his existence more meaningful. I
182
00:10:07.720 --> 00:10:10.720
think as well, just simply living in certain environments can
183
00:10:10.759 --> 00:10:13.360
make our lives more important. So if if you live
184
00:10:13.440 --> 00:10:19.399
in a beautiful place, perhaps there's there's nature or really
185
00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:22.919
intricate old architecture, I think a life can be more
186
00:10:22.960 --> 00:10:26.240
important for being in that environment, as opposed to just
187
00:10:26.360 --> 00:10:30.360
being in a place with blocks of prefabricated apartments something
188
00:10:30.440 --> 00:10:36.360
like that, you know, sort of standardized, standardized flats, and
189
00:10:36.399 --> 00:10:40.519
that again doesn't evolve striving to achieve a purpose. So
190
00:10:41.240 --> 00:10:44.519
I think a chunk of meaning consists of achieving purpose.
191
00:10:44.639 --> 00:10:48.120
But we can but meaning can sometimes come to us passively.
192
00:10:48.200 --> 00:10:50.799
We can be recipients of love or recognition, or we
193
00:10:50.960 --> 00:10:54.320
can just be in a setting that we didn't create ourselves,
194
00:10:54.320 --> 00:10:56.039
but we're lucky enough to be there.
195
00:10:58.279 --> 00:11:00.679
So I'll comment on a couple of things there. One
196
00:11:00.799 --> 00:11:03.360
is so from my vantage point as a as a
197
00:11:03.399 --> 00:11:06.639
logo therapist, and we can talk about that next or whatever,
198
00:11:06.720 --> 00:11:09.000
but but definitely want to situate it because that's really
199
00:11:09.120 --> 00:11:13.240
my it's my chief way of really understanding or embracing
200
00:11:13.279 --> 00:11:15.039
the world of meaning. You know, that's the doctor Pritt
201
00:11:15.080 --> 00:11:18.919
Frankel's work, of course, and and so you know, the
202
00:11:18.960 --> 00:11:22.879
way it's situated in logo logo therapy or logo philosophy
203
00:11:23.039 --> 00:11:25.960
is that meaning is really it's our chief concern and
204
00:11:26.000 --> 00:11:29.759
it's our chief source of energy. So how I distinguish
205
00:11:29.799 --> 00:11:32.639
meaning and purpose is meaning is our is our energy source,
206
00:11:32.679 --> 00:11:35.440
and purpose is the directionality, if you will, a where
207
00:11:35.440 --> 00:11:38.080
we're aiming, if you will, our passions and our and
208
00:11:38.120 --> 00:11:40.600
our and our energies. So that's how I like to
209
00:11:40.679 --> 00:11:43.360
I like to situate it. Do you know anything about
210
00:11:43.440 --> 00:11:44.320
logo therapy or.
211
00:11:45.279 --> 00:11:47.919
I read from long ago, and I sort of have
212
00:11:47.960 --> 00:11:51.799
a broad sense of the basics. Sure, you know, from
213
00:11:51.840 --> 00:11:55.320
my own view, I think achieving the purpose is often meaningful.
214
00:11:55.320 --> 00:11:56.919
It's got to be the right purpose. Can't just be
215
00:11:57.000 --> 00:12:01.600
any ye, right. If the p is to just count
216
00:12:01.639 --> 00:12:05.360
blades of grass or walk in a circle consistently and
217
00:12:05.399 --> 00:12:11.080
there's no sort of valuable output, it's not meaningful. It
218
00:12:11.080 --> 00:12:13.399
doesn't make one's life more important. There's got to be
219
00:12:13.440 --> 00:12:15.200
something more to the purpose.
220
00:12:15.879 --> 00:12:18.320
Yeah, And that's where this is so interesting that I mean,
221
00:12:18.440 --> 00:12:20.960
I really got interested in the world of meaning and
222
00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:24.559
purpose in my mid twenties when I was then at
223
00:12:24.559 --> 00:12:26.840
that time living with my boyfriend, first in Spain and
224
00:12:26.879 --> 00:12:28.759
then in Brazil for a total of about three years.
225
00:12:29.080 --> 00:12:32.039
An amazing life, you know, a really really beautiful, opulent life,
226
00:12:32.080 --> 00:12:35.480
living made chauffeur, a gardener, the whole thing. And what
227
00:12:35.559 --> 00:12:39.360
I discovered, though was the emptiness of that. And that's
228
00:12:39.360 --> 00:12:41.519
when I discovered that we as humans are you know,
229
00:12:41.559 --> 00:12:43.799
we're best when we're needed. And you talk about that
230
00:12:43.840 --> 00:12:46.840
too in your book, and that's of course the self
231
00:12:46.840 --> 00:12:50.039
transcendence part of things. And so you know, what I
232
00:12:50.080 --> 00:12:52.279
talk about in my work is purpose is always about
233
00:12:52.279 --> 00:12:55.039
serving something beyond yourself. And so you know, the counting
234
00:12:55.080 --> 00:12:57.679
the blades of graphs, etcetera. Really isn't helping someone out
235
00:12:57.840 --> 00:13:01.399
or something else. So therefore wouldn't really qualify for you know,
236
00:13:01.480 --> 00:13:04.320
for a purpose either. But anyway, so that's just where
237
00:13:04.320 --> 00:13:06.360
it came from for me, as I discovered just how
238
00:13:06.399 --> 00:13:09.399
empty it is when you really aren't being of service,
239
00:13:09.440 --> 00:13:10.320
you're not being needed.
240
00:13:11.399 --> 00:13:13.759
Yeah, I think that's true. And a lot of that
241
00:13:13.799 --> 00:13:17.200
comes down to activity doing something. So if I go
242
00:13:17.320 --> 00:13:21.960
back to the experience machine thought experiment, there isn't and
243
00:13:22.200 --> 00:13:25.519
there isn't an agent, There isn't an actor fulfilling a purpose.