WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.279
The topics and opinions express in the following show are
2
00:00:02.279 --> 00:00:03.919
solely those of the hosts and their guests, and not
3
00:00:03.960 --> 00:00:06.839
those of W FOURCY Radio. It's employees are affiliates. We
4
00:00:06.919 --> 00:00:10.000
make no recommendations or endorsements for radio show programs, services,
5
00:00:10.039 --> 00:00:12.400
or products mentioned on air or on our web. No
6
00:00:12.480 --> 00:00:15.679
liability explicitor implies shall be extended to W FOURCY Radio
7
00:00:15.720 --> 00:00:18.480
or its employees are affiliates. Any questions or comments should
8
00:00:18.480 --> 00:00:20.839
be directed to those show hosts. Thank you for choosing
9
00:00:20.960 --> 00:00:27.719
W FOURCY Radio.
10
00:00:28.120 --> 00:00:29.320
What's working on Purpose?
11
00:00:29.399 --> 00:00:32.640
Anyway? Each week we ponder the answer to this question.
12
00:00:33.119 --> 00:00:36.000
People ache for meaning and purpose at work, to contribute
13
00:00:36.039 --> 00:00:39.719
their talents passionately and know their lives really matter. They
14
00:00:39.799 --> 00:00:42.600
crave being part of an organization that inspires them and
15
00:00:42.640 --> 00:00:46.200
helps them grow into realizing their highest potential. Business can
16
00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:49.359
be such a force for good in the world, elevating humanity.
17
00:00:49.600 --> 00:00:52.719
In our program, we provide guidance and inspiration to help
18
00:00:52.799 --> 00:00:57.039
usher in this world we all want Working on Purpose. Now,
19
00:00:57.159 --> 00:00:59.640
here's your host, doctor Elise Cortes.
20
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:06.400
Welcome back to the Working on Purpose program, which has
21
00:01:06.400 --> 00:01:08.239
been brought to you with passion and pride since February
22
00:01:08.280 --> 00:01:10.719
of twenty fifteen, test Town. In this week create to
23
00:01:10.719 --> 00:01:13.200
have you. I'm your host doctor at least Cortes. If
24
00:01:13.200 --> 00:01:14.879
we have not met before, you don't know me. I'm
25
00:01:14.879 --> 00:01:18.439
an organizational psychologist and logo therapist, speaker and author. My
26
00:01:18.519 --> 00:01:20.680
team and I at Gusto Now help companies to enlive
27
00:01:20.680 --> 00:01:23.439
and in fortify their operations by building a dynamic, high
28
00:01:23.439 --> 00:01:26.840
performance culture and inspirational leadership activated by meaning and purpose.
29
00:01:27.319 --> 00:01:30.280
Did you know that inspired employees outperform their satisfied peers
30
00:01:30.280 --> 00:01:32.319
by a factor of two point twenty five to one.
31
00:01:32.519 --> 00:01:34.719
In other words, inspiration is good for the bottom line.
32
00:01:34.840 --> 00:01:36.239
You can me more about us and how we can work
33
00:01:36.239 --> 00:01:39.640
together at gastadashnow dot com or my personal site at
34
00:01:39.719 --> 00:01:42.799
least Coortes dot com. Heading in today's program we have
35
00:01:42.920 --> 00:01:46.239
with us Today. Shavn Michale who helps people lead change
36
00:01:46.280 --> 00:01:50.480
and her why today is better workforces, better workplaces. She
37
00:01:50.560 --> 00:01:53.680
has worked across four continents helping thousands of leaders to
38
00:01:53.760 --> 00:01:57.120
create more agile and productive workplaces. She also has been
39
00:01:57.159 --> 00:01:59.719
on the inside as the executive in charge of Culture
40
00:01:59.799 --> 00:02:03.239
Chain and a series of large multinational organizations. She is
41
00:02:03.280 --> 00:02:06.239
the author of The High Mind at work harnessing the
42
00:02:06.239 --> 00:02:09.280
power of group intelligence to create meaningful and lasting change,
43
00:02:09.360 --> 00:02:11.919
which we'll be talking about today. She joined it today
44
00:02:11.919 --> 00:02:14.639
from Melbourne, Australia, where I believe it's ten a m.
45
00:02:14.800 --> 00:02:18.280
Wednesday and it's five pm Tuesday for me, Shavon A
46
00:02:18.360 --> 00:02:20.000
hearty welcome to Working on Purpose.
47
00:02:21.159 --> 00:02:25.719
Thank you very much, Alise, and a good day from Melbourne, Australia.
48
00:02:25.840 --> 00:02:27.919
It's wonderful. It's so wonderful to have you.
49
00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:31.439
I terribly enjoyed reading your beautiful book, and I really
50
00:02:32.120 --> 00:02:34.680
have a suspicion just how much work and effort this
51
00:02:35.080 --> 00:02:35.400
put in.
52
00:02:35.439 --> 00:02:36.280
All of your acknowledges.
53
00:02:36.360 --> 00:02:39.240
Acknowledgements told me, of course that you had a lot
54
00:02:39.240 --> 00:02:41.159
of support, but I really want to applaud you for
55
00:02:41.240 --> 00:02:43.919
creating such a beautiful, well written book.
56
00:02:45.120 --> 00:02:48.039
Well, thank you so much, and I hope you enjoyed
57
00:02:48.039 --> 00:02:48.439
it and.
58
00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:49.680
That it's helpful.
59
00:02:50.120 --> 00:02:50.560
I did.
60
00:02:50.680 --> 00:02:53.080
I gleaned a lot of things from it, and one
61
00:02:53.080 --> 00:02:54.520
of the things I want to open with I think
62
00:02:54.520 --> 00:02:57.840
it's pretty fascinating. I love your whole how you situate
63
00:02:57.879 --> 00:03:01.319
the whole book. Of course, in the Wisdom from Bees,
64
00:03:01.319 --> 00:03:03.039
you got to think about bees, I got to think
65
00:03:03.039 --> 00:03:07.400
about owls, so could you talk about your fascination, Where
66
00:03:07.400 --> 00:03:10.039
did your fascination come from with bees and kind of
67
00:03:10.080 --> 00:03:12.280
a little bit of how you're leaning on it, especially
68
00:03:12.360 --> 00:03:14.439
for the work of this book.
69
00:03:15.439 --> 00:03:19.599
Sure, lis So, I grew up in Ireland and as
70
00:03:19.639 --> 00:03:23.680
a child I was fascinated by the bees as they
71
00:03:23.800 --> 00:03:27.879
swarmed in the orchard of my family's farm. And this
72
00:03:28.039 --> 00:03:33.360
fascination with natural ecosystems actually led me to a path,
73
00:03:33.599 --> 00:03:39.080
a career path studying human ecosystems. So I'm really fascinated
74
00:03:39.199 --> 00:03:44.000
by how groups operate, not just individuals, and this led
75
00:03:44.039 --> 00:03:47.879
me into a career path as I call an insider.
76
00:03:48.000 --> 00:03:51.599
But yeah, this fascinating fascination with the bees actually led
77
00:03:51.639 --> 00:03:56.000
me into a career in psychology, organizational psychology, and eventually
78
00:03:56.360 --> 00:04:00.319
to become an insider, the executive in charge of change
79
00:04:00.319 --> 00:04:02.240
in a series of multinational firms.
80
00:04:02.280 --> 00:04:05.039
As you mentioned, I.
81
00:04:05.039 --> 00:04:09.159
Really appreciate an alignevon with this idea of really relying
82
00:04:09.199 --> 00:04:12.319
on and shall we say, drawing from the wisdom of nature.
83
00:04:12.800 --> 00:04:14.759
So there's a lot we can talk about it, and I
84
00:04:14.759 --> 00:04:16.480
will be weaving some of your concepts that you got
85
00:04:16.480 --> 00:04:18.600
directly from really understanding bees as we go.
86
00:04:19.360 --> 00:04:21.160
And let's next take it then.
87
00:04:21.079 --> 00:04:24.439
To you have this this idea here that you've developed
88
00:04:24.439 --> 00:04:26.680
and you draw from when you implement change and help
89
00:04:26.680 --> 00:04:29.279
others do the same. These nine laws of group dynamics.
90
00:04:29.480 --> 00:04:30.759
I don't really know that we need to go through
91
00:04:30.839 --> 00:04:32.600
all nine of them, but it would be nice maybe
92
00:04:32.639 --> 00:04:34.839
to help give a flavor to our listeners and viewers
93
00:04:34.839 --> 00:04:36.519
as to just maybe what a few of those laws
94
00:04:36.600 --> 00:04:39.680
might be and indicate just how they really are situated
95
00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:41.360
from the wisdom of bees.
96
00:04:43.000 --> 00:04:46.720
Yes, well, at least most people when they think about change,
97
00:04:46.759 --> 00:04:50.160
they've been given what I call an interpersonal toolkit, so
98
00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:53.480
they're looking at change from an individual perspective and how
99
00:04:53.600 --> 00:04:57.040
individuals behave. But we need to add to that picture
100
00:04:57.120 --> 00:05:00.600
with what I call a systemic lens and under standing
101
00:05:00.639 --> 00:05:04.079
of how complex human ecosystems operate.
102
00:05:04.680 --> 00:05:06.399
And we can learn a lot from the.
103
00:05:06.360 --> 00:05:09.439
Bees in terms of how bees swarm and how bees
104
00:05:09.519 --> 00:05:16.000
operate when they undergo change, and from examining bees and examining.
105
00:05:15.560 --> 00:05:18.000
Human groups or human ecosystems.
106
00:05:18.040 --> 00:05:22.360
Over in many decades, I've formulated these nine laws, and
107
00:05:22.720 --> 00:05:26.040
one of them, for example, is the law of role.
108
00:05:26.759 --> 00:05:31.720
So often we're taught that human behavior is governed by personality,
109
00:05:32.199 --> 00:05:35.959
and yes, personality has an impact on our behavior, but
110
00:05:36.120 --> 00:05:39.439
so does roll and the role that we take up
111
00:05:39.600 --> 00:05:41.720
in any group or in any system.
112
00:05:41.800 --> 00:05:42.439
If you like.
113
00:05:44.040 --> 00:05:48.040
Beautiful and then if you could speak to maybe embeddedness,
114
00:05:48.120 --> 00:05:50.000
I find that one really really fascinating.
115
00:05:51.439 --> 00:05:55.759
Yeah, the law of embeddedness is really about how sticky
116
00:05:55.959 --> 00:06:00.480
change can be, because when you do things for a
117
00:06:00.560 --> 00:06:05.199
long time in any group setting, it becomes embedded. And
118
00:06:05.279 --> 00:06:10.439
that is about how it's deeply wired into that organizational
119
00:06:10.480 --> 00:06:13.800
system or into that workforce to do things in a
120
00:06:13.839 --> 00:06:17.959
certain way. So in order to change, you've actually got
121
00:06:17.959 --> 00:06:22.120
to rewire that. We've got to physically rewire how things
122
00:06:22.160 --> 00:06:25.600
are done, and that is often painful because it means
123
00:06:25.759 --> 00:06:29.560
rewiring the neural pathways in our brains. So you've got
124
00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:32.839
to understand how embedded the change is. And the more
125
00:06:32.879 --> 00:06:36.240
embedded it is that behavior, the more difficult it will
126
00:06:36.279 --> 00:06:38.040
be to bring about change.
127
00:06:39.720 --> 00:06:42.959
So beautiful explained. Then just finally one more, how about
128
00:06:43.639 --> 00:06:45.120
pattern blindness.
129
00:06:46.439 --> 00:06:52.680
Yeah, Passions are the hidden agreements between different parts of
130
00:06:52.720 --> 00:06:56.639
a group, and these hidden agreements often capture us. So
131
00:06:56.680 --> 00:07:01.639
we walk into any group very quickly we are caught
132
00:07:01.680 --> 00:07:04.800
by the patterns in that group. So I often explain
133
00:07:04.879 --> 00:07:07.879
it in this way. In a family situation. You know,
134
00:07:08.040 --> 00:07:10.079
if you're in a new relationship and you bring your
135
00:07:10.120 --> 00:07:13.600
new partner into your family for the first time, they
136
00:07:13.600 --> 00:07:16.439
can often see things that you've become blind to.
137
00:07:17.120 --> 00:07:18.319
That's just the way.
138
00:07:18.199 --> 00:07:20.680
Things are done in our family. Isn't that the same
139
00:07:20.759 --> 00:07:24.279
in all families? Well, actually no, it's not. But because
140
00:07:24.319 --> 00:07:27.759
we are part of that family, we become blind to
141
00:07:27.839 --> 00:07:31.920
that pattern. It becomes norm the norm, and the same
142
00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:36.439
things happen within the workplace. We are captured by these patterns.
143
00:07:36.720 --> 00:07:42.680
They become the norm, and we actually sometimes overlook the
144
00:07:42.680 --> 00:07:46.639
fact that they are maybe dysfunctional, are no longer serving
145
00:07:46.800 --> 00:07:48.480
the organization optimally.
146
00:07:50.000 --> 00:07:51.639
And that's one of the many things that really struck
147
00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:53.839
me about your book, Shavin. And certainly I could relate
148
00:07:54.360 --> 00:07:58.120
doing it also helping organizations to transform culture. Right, we're
149
00:07:58.120 --> 00:07:59.519
doing the same thing. We're helping to be able to
150
00:07:59.519 --> 00:08:02.199
hold a pedal. But these are in the mirror above this.
151
00:08:02.360 --> 00:08:05.279
These are the patterns that are running your organization. As
152
00:08:05.319 --> 00:08:08.519
you would say, they oftentimes aren't aware of those, And
153
00:08:08.519 --> 00:08:10.439
so I thought there was so much that we could
154
00:08:10.480 --> 00:08:13.120
take from these different laws. And as we go along
155
00:08:13.160 --> 00:08:15.439
and talk about examples of different companies. I think it
156
00:08:15.560 --> 00:08:18.560
will really help our listeners and viewers really also start
157
00:08:18.600 --> 00:08:21.519
to get the AHAs for themselves. So we'll carry on
158
00:08:22.600 --> 00:08:24.319
now what I'd love to do here. This is so
159
00:08:24.439 --> 00:08:27.319
interesting too, also as somebody who helps spirit change, not
160
00:08:27.360 --> 00:08:29.920
on the same level that you do, but I appreciated
161
00:08:29.959 --> 00:08:32.240
that you said that change failures usually stem from two
162
00:08:32.279 --> 00:08:35.960
conventional ways of thinking about transformation. Can you situate those
163
00:08:35.960 --> 00:08:37.840
two conventional and then we'll talk about the way you
164
00:08:37.879 --> 00:08:38.200
do it.
165
00:08:40.039 --> 00:08:40.399
Yeah.
166
00:08:40.440 --> 00:08:44.639
So the conventional ways of thinking about organizations are firstly,
167
00:08:45.039 --> 00:08:50.759
that organizations are machines. And this really stands from I
168
00:08:50.759 --> 00:08:54.399
suppose in you Tonian thinking in the sixteen hundreds, where
169
00:08:54.879 --> 00:08:59.440
we see organizations like clock like mechanisms where you can
170
00:08:59.480 --> 00:09:04.879
pull a leadver oil of ratchet, drive change all of these.
171
00:09:05.080 --> 00:09:07.879
Even the language that we use would indicate that we
172
00:09:07.960 --> 00:09:14.080
see organizations often like machines and in that machine metaphor,
173
00:09:14.559 --> 00:09:18.320
humans are our mere cogs in the machine that can
174
00:09:18.360 --> 00:09:23.559
be manipulated. So that's one lens on organizations, and it
175
00:09:23.639 --> 00:09:28.320
impacts how we drive change and fix things. The second
176
00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:34.159
lens is that we see organizations more as social networks,
177
00:09:34.720 --> 00:09:38.159
and this emerged from the thinking of Ja Bynes, who
178
00:09:38.240 --> 00:09:42.240
is an anthropologist studying a village in Norway, and he
179
00:09:42.320 --> 00:09:46.000
began to map the influencers in that village and he
180
00:09:46.159 --> 00:09:49.639
described them as nodes in the network. And the people
181
00:09:49.679 --> 00:09:54.159
who had more influence had bigger connections, more connections, and
182
00:09:54.679 --> 00:09:56.960
we can see the influence of this very much an
183
00:09:56.960 --> 00:10:00.519
interpersonal lens. So in the social network, you need EQ
184
00:10:01.120 --> 00:10:04.919
are emotional intelligence in order to have influence, and the
185
00:10:04.960 --> 00:10:09.639
influencers could help garner or create change, and that is
186
00:10:09.679 --> 00:10:13.600
another lens. But the third lens that I'm introducing is
187
00:10:13.639 --> 00:10:18.399
an ecosystem lens, which is that organizations or groups are
188
00:10:18.799 --> 00:10:24.000
ecosystems where each part of that ecosystem has a critical
189
00:10:24.159 --> 00:10:28.559
role to play. It's not about IQ in the machine,
190
00:10:28.639 --> 00:10:32.440
it's not about EQ in the social network. It's more
191
00:10:32.480 --> 00:10:37.039
about group intelligence in the ecosystem.
192
00:10:37.159 --> 00:10:37.960
I appreciate that.
193
00:10:38.000 --> 00:10:41.360
So the first one, the sixteen hundred early more logical,
194
00:10:41.440 --> 00:10:44.960
functional rational, of course, being the IQ space, the sort
195
00:10:44.960 --> 00:10:46.879
of nowork being the EQ space. And then of course
196
00:10:46.919 --> 00:10:50.279
you were distinguishing yours as the GQ space, which I
197
00:10:50.320 --> 00:10:52.399
think is fascinating. And you know, when we get into
198
00:10:52.440 --> 00:10:55.279
this next example about Coke. I don't know if you
199
00:10:55.399 --> 00:10:57.679
know this or not, but I don't even know if
200
00:10:57.679 --> 00:11:00.440
it's still around. But we had a very popular magazine
201
00:11:00.480 --> 00:11:03.279
here in the United States called GQ, and it was
202
00:11:03.360 --> 00:11:07.759
really it was really do you know this? It was
203
00:11:07.799 --> 00:11:10.120
you know, it was about kind of sex appeal and such,
204
00:11:10.159 --> 00:11:13.039
and so it didn't speak to group intelligence, but it
205
00:11:13.120 --> 00:11:16.080
certainly would be an attractive sort of way to talk about,
206
00:11:16.399 --> 00:11:19.399
you know, the idea of harnessing group intelligence through a
207
00:11:19.440 --> 00:11:21.840
GQ kind of lens for at least Americans as well.
208
00:11:23.039 --> 00:11:25.519
Yeah, I've heard of that magazine, but.
209
00:11:25.480 --> 00:11:29.000
It's not right right, kind of has a nice little
210
00:11:29.000 --> 00:11:34.000
fun flavor to it though, Chian right, Okay, speaking of flavor,
211
00:11:34.519 --> 00:11:37.559
let's talk now this. I was really compelled by all
212
00:11:37.600 --> 00:11:40.480
of your business examples that really showcase this this these
213
00:11:40.559 --> 00:11:43.639
kinds of different ideas and frameworks that you have developed, Shaman,
214
00:11:43.759 --> 00:11:46.240
and so the idea when you were sharing in the
215
00:11:46.240 --> 00:11:49.399
book about how I think it was Coke wanting to
216
00:11:49.399 --> 00:11:53.320
move into the UK with its you know, non flavored
217
00:11:53.399 --> 00:11:56.559
or non colored water or something like that, Can you
218
00:11:56.600 --> 00:12:00.519
share that that case and just why that case study
219
00:12:00.559 --> 00:12:04.279
and why it went so a right, Yeah.
220
00:12:04.240 --> 00:12:06.399
So, as you mentioned the hard mind at work is
221
00:12:07.559 --> 00:12:10.639
full of these sort of case studies, practical case studies.
222
00:12:10.679 --> 00:12:13.720
Because I'm an insider, I'm less interested in theory and
223
00:12:13.799 --> 00:12:17.080
more interested in practicality and how can we really bring
224
00:12:17.120 --> 00:12:19.960
about change? And one of the case studies, some of
225
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:22.000
them are from my own experience, and some of them
226
00:12:22.000 --> 00:12:26.039
are from research on big companies where change failed miserably,
227
00:12:26.080 --> 00:12:29.559
And one of those was Coke where it was introducing
228
00:12:29.840 --> 00:12:33.919
DESIGNI into the UK market with a view to expanding
229
00:12:33.960 --> 00:12:38.840
into nineteen countries across Europe. But that failed miserably because
230
00:12:39.559 --> 00:12:42.120
of well, initially it was because of what I call
231
00:12:42.159 --> 00:12:47.320
the order giver pattern. So there were order givers in
232
00:12:47.360 --> 00:12:50.919
the Atlanta head office of Coke that were giving the
233
00:12:51.080 --> 00:12:55.600
orders of the instructions to the order takers in the UK.
234
00:12:56.480 --> 00:13:00.799
And basically the pattern, or the hidden agreen and between
235
00:13:00.919 --> 00:13:04.039
the head office and the regions within Coke at this
236
00:13:04.200 --> 00:13:08.000
time was that you take orders from the order givers.
237
00:13:09.320 --> 00:13:13.360
So nobody questioned the orders and everybody just went along
238
00:13:13.440 --> 00:13:18.000
on the tried and tested method of introducing DESIGNY into
239
00:13:18.600 --> 00:13:21.799
a new territory and assuming that it would be successful.
240
00:13:21.879 --> 00:13:25.120
But actually the case study goes into a lot of
241
00:13:25.159 --> 00:13:28.759
detail on this, but the UK consumers did not see
242
00:13:28.879 --> 00:13:32.600
designy in the same way as the US consumers, So
243
00:13:32.720 --> 00:13:36.399
context is everything, and seeing the pattern and not being