WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:02.399
The topics and opinions express in the following show are
2
00:00:02.399 --> 00:00:04.040
solely those of the hosts and their guests and not
3
00:00:04.080 --> 00:00:06.960
those of W FOURCY Radio. It's employees are affiliates. We
4
00:00:07.040 --> 00:00:10.199
make no recommendations or endorsements radio show, programs, services, or
5
00:00:10.240 --> 00:00:13.119
products mentioned on air or on our web. No liability,
6
00:00:13.119 --> 00:00:15.759
explicit or implied shall be extended to W FOURCY Radio
7
00:00:15.839 --> 00:00:18.559
or its employees are affiliates. Any questions or comments should
8
00:00:18.600 --> 00:00:20.879
be directed to those show hosts. Thank you for choosing
9
00:00:21.079 --> 00:00:22.519
W FOURCY Radio.
10
00:00:28.239 --> 00:00:31.640
What's working on Purpose? Anyway? Each week we ponder the
11
00:00:31.679 --> 00:00:34.840
answer to this question. People ache for meaning and purpose
12
00:00:34.880 --> 00:00:38.240
at work, to contribute their talents passionately and know their
13
00:00:38.280 --> 00:00:41.640
lives really matter. They crave being part of an organization
14
00:00:41.719 --> 00:00:44.439
that inspires them and helps them grow into realizing their
15
00:00:44.520 --> 00:00:47.560
highest potential. Business can be such a force for good
16
00:00:47.600 --> 00:00:51.240
in the world, elevating humanity. In our program, we provide
17
00:00:51.240 --> 00:00:54.280
guidance and inspiration to help usher in this world we
18
00:00:54.320 --> 00:00:58.640
all want working on Purpose. Now, here's your host, doctor
19
00:00:58.640 --> 00:00:59.719
Elise Cortez.
20
00:01:05.439 --> 00:01:07.599
Welcome back to the Working and Purpose Program, which has
21
00:01:07.400 --> 00:01:09.680
been brought to you with passionate pride since February of
22
00:01:09.719 --> 00:01:12.040
twenty fifteen. Thanks for tuning it again this week. Great
23
00:01:12.120 --> 00:01:14.200
to have you. I'm your host, doctor Real Lease Cortes.
24
00:01:14.640 --> 00:01:16.359
If we've not met before and you don't know me,
25
00:01:16.480 --> 00:01:21.120
I'm a workforce advisor, organizational psychologist, management consultant, logo therapist,
26
00:01:21.120 --> 00:01:23.680
speaker and author. My team and I at gusto Now
27
00:01:23.680 --> 00:01:26.400
help companies to enliven and fortify their operations by building
28
00:01:26.400 --> 00:01:30.719
a dynamic, high performance culture, inspirational leadership and nursery managers
29
00:01:30.760 --> 00:01:33.959
activated by meaning and purpose. You can learn more about
30
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:36.680
us at gustodashnow dot com or my personal site at
31
00:01:36.719 --> 00:01:40.280
last Coortes dot com. With us today is James Rutt.
32
00:01:40.280 --> 00:01:42.719
He's a senior partner of bin In Company and chair
33
00:01:42.799 --> 00:01:45.599
of Bane Futures. He's also the author of The Architect
34
00:01:45.799 --> 00:01:48.560
Archetype Effect, which is what we're talking about today, and
35
00:01:48.599 --> 00:01:51.239
that book is about offering readers a new way to
36
00:01:51.319 --> 00:01:54.239
understand what motivates them at work every day and why
37
00:01:54.280 --> 00:01:56.840
they feel how they feel about their job. He joins
38
00:01:56.879 --> 00:01:58.879
us a DIF from London, where he's currently on site
39
00:01:58.879 --> 00:02:01.560
doing some work his home in Hong Kong. A hearty
40
00:02:01.599 --> 00:02:03.480
welcome James to working on Purpose.
41
00:02:04.040 --> 00:02:06.319
Great to be here. Thank you, elease, so welcome.
42
00:02:06.400 --> 00:02:08.319
So glad I found you, and I stumbled across your
43
00:02:08.319 --> 00:02:10.400
book and then I went up to my trusted friend
44
00:02:10.400 --> 00:02:12.520
LinkedIn and reached out to you and said, Hey, come
45
00:02:12.520 --> 00:02:14.919
play with me on my podcast. Let's talk about this
46
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:18.560
magnificent work. So let's first command and celebrate this beautiful
47
00:02:18.599 --> 00:02:20.879
thing you put into the world. James. It's really gorgeous.
48
00:02:20.919 --> 00:02:23.039
I loved reading every single last page of it.
49
00:02:23.439 --> 00:02:25.319
I'm so pleased, thank you, You're.
50
00:02:25.199 --> 00:02:28.520
So welcome, so welcome and considering. I also am a
51
00:02:28.560 --> 00:02:32.000
meeting and work researcher and identity researcher and found fifteen
52
00:02:32.039 --> 00:02:34.439
modes of engagement that I found when you looked at
53
00:02:34.479 --> 00:02:37.520
the level of meaning that people ascribe to their work
54
00:02:37.680 --> 00:02:39.840
and how that works relates to their sense of self,
55
00:02:39.879 --> 00:02:42.919
I found fifteen. So your work is really interesting and
56
00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:46.199
sort of helps align and further illuminate what I did.
57
00:02:46.280 --> 00:02:50.199
So exciting. But you and I are kind of geeky
58
00:02:50.199 --> 00:02:53.039
and weird in this way. So why did you why?
59
00:02:53.080 --> 00:02:57.680
What's your fascination with motivations of work? Where'd that come from?
60
00:02:58.120 --> 00:03:00.719
I mean, it comes directly from my day job, if
61
00:03:00.719 --> 00:03:07.560
I can call it that. Okay, as an advisor to corporations, public, private,
62
00:03:07.639 --> 00:03:10.599
family founder led business says, trying to help them improve
63
00:03:10.599 --> 00:03:12.240
their performance, which is what we do than is what
64
00:03:12.280 --> 00:03:15.680
I've been doing for thirty five years. There was definitely
65
00:03:15.759 --> 00:03:19.080
something changing in the way that the individuals at those
66
00:03:19.199 --> 00:03:22.439
firms related to their jobs, and there was something also
67
00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:26.280
changing in the needs that the firms or the organizations
68
00:03:26.319 --> 00:03:28.439
had from those people. With the advent of more and
69
00:03:28.520 --> 00:03:33.080
more waves of automation and technology and efficiency programs, something
70
00:03:33.159 --> 00:03:35.439
was changing on both sides of the leisure So that
71
00:03:35.759 --> 00:03:37.840
got me very very provoked on this topic.
72
00:03:38.840 --> 00:03:41.479
Thank you love it well. And then, of course, as
73
00:03:41.520 --> 00:03:43.520
you were going through and we'll talk later in one
74
00:03:43.560 --> 00:03:45.360
of other segments about just how it was that you
75
00:03:45.360 --> 00:03:47.680
did this research, because that's pretty interesting too and really
76
00:03:47.680 --> 00:03:49.680
what you were considering when when you looked at the
77
00:03:49.680 --> 00:03:52.879
components of it. But you did make a delightful discovery
78
00:03:53.039 --> 00:03:55.719
in that you've discovered pretty quickly that not everybody is
79
00:03:55.759 --> 00:04:00.159
motivated to work for the same reason. No surprise there, I.
80
00:04:00.080 --> 00:04:05.120
Think, no surprise, but an oddly sort of veiled secret,
81
00:04:06.159 --> 00:04:10.199
and at least in the way that the conventional talent
82
00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:12.800
management systems that are you know, the hrms that are
83
00:04:12.800 --> 00:04:16.040
embedded in so many firms, whether from the giants, the
84
00:04:16.160 --> 00:04:18.839
SAPs or Matters or the people's source what have, or
85
00:04:18.839 --> 00:04:21.800
even from a smaller class assume. So the assumption that
86
00:04:22.639 --> 00:04:28.680
underpins those systems I think are old. They're outdated. They
87
00:04:28.720 --> 00:04:31.360
are fifty plus years old, and go back to a
88
00:04:31.480 --> 00:04:35.519
time when you could meaningfully talk about an average worker
89
00:04:35.839 --> 00:04:39.560
and design a talent system around an average worker. And
90
00:04:39.879 --> 00:04:43.120
if I could sort of summarize what I mean by that,
91
00:04:44.240 --> 00:04:49.240
it is an assumption that whether your labor, whether your management,
92
00:04:49.279 --> 00:04:52.639
whether you're labor trying to become management, sometimes you are
93
00:04:52.800 --> 00:04:57.360
in your job just trying to climb the pole, just
94
00:04:57.639 --> 00:04:59.800
trying to take the next step up the ladder to
95
00:05:00.279 --> 00:05:02.439
you know, more layers between you and everybody else and
96
00:05:02.519 --> 00:05:06.519
wider spans and more responsibilities. And you know, that was
97
00:05:06.600 --> 00:05:11.639
kind of the model that informed organization design, reward structures,
98
00:05:11.680 --> 00:05:16.920
performance management, career pathing for decades and decades and decades,
99
00:05:16.959 --> 00:05:19.040
and it worked really well. Let's not pretend it was
100
00:05:19.040 --> 00:05:20.720
a failure. It wasn't. It was really really good and
101
00:05:20.759 --> 00:05:25.319
successful because we just didn't assume that individual motivations mattered
102
00:05:25.439 --> 00:05:28.519
at all. And I think that you can no longer
103
00:05:28.560 --> 00:05:30.959
get away with that. So both on the organization side,
104
00:05:31.399 --> 00:05:34.240
where now you know, that concept of the professional manager
105
00:05:34.360 --> 00:05:37.120
trudging is or her way up the ladder is is
106
00:05:37.160 --> 00:05:40.920
still real, but it's no longer necessarily the main event.
107
00:05:40.959 --> 00:05:44.800
In many firms, individual contributors are important. Coaches, advisor, expert
108
00:05:44.959 --> 00:05:47.600
roles have become more and more important, do more and
109
00:05:47.639 --> 00:05:50.920
more work, particularly supported by technology. And then on the
110
00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:55.199
human side. You know, while we said to people, who
111
00:05:55.199 --> 00:05:56.759
do you want to be? You know, we like to
112
00:05:56.800 --> 00:05:58.480
empower you to be who you want to be at work,
113
00:05:58.519 --> 00:06:02.639
a fantastic thing to do. Turns out, ironically they turned
114
00:06:02.639 --> 00:06:04.439
around as well, I don't want to be that person
115
00:06:04.480 --> 00:06:08.079
who's just climbing the ladder. Some do, and that's great
116
00:06:08.439 --> 00:06:10.720
problem for them, but lots do not. They prefer a
117
00:06:10.720 --> 00:06:13.920
different model, and yet our systems are still predicated on
118
00:06:13.959 --> 00:06:15.360
that old set of beliefs.
119
00:06:16.839 --> 00:06:19.120
To that in, James, I really like what you say,
120
00:06:19.120 --> 00:06:21.720
and but there's so many quotable pieces of your book,
121
00:06:21.759 --> 00:06:23.639
But I like how you call for the need to
122
00:06:23.759 --> 00:06:27.160
de average the employee and build good jobs and career
123
00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:29.360
paths that meet the needs of this diverse workforce. To
124
00:06:29.399 --> 00:06:32.720
your point, and what I find so exciting about your
125
00:06:32.759 --> 00:06:34.000
work and part of the reason I wanted to have
126
00:06:34.040 --> 00:06:36.240
you on is it's one thing to illuminate these this
127
00:06:36.360 --> 00:06:39.199
opportunity and this problem. It's another to be able to
128
00:06:39.240 --> 00:06:41.680
start help organizations to move toward a solution, and I
129
00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:44.079
think your work really does that. So this idea of
130
00:06:44.120 --> 00:06:46.439
de averaging the worker is pretty interesting.
131
00:06:48.199 --> 00:06:51.920
Yes, And trust me, I'm there's no false modesty and
132
00:06:51.920 --> 00:06:54.000
what I'm about to say because you're a real psychologist,
133
00:06:57.040 --> 00:07:00.720
I'm a business advisor and a strategist to understood that
134
00:07:00.800 --> 00:07:05.639
without people are still the most valuable resource AI, cloud, mobile,
135
00:07:05.720 --> 00:07:08.680
PC revolution and Internet notwithstanding, people are still the most
136
00:07:08.759 --> 00:07:12.879
valuable resource that we have, and they are motivated differently.
137
00:07:13.000 --> 00:07:15.680
I think we can prove that if it wasn't already obvious,
138
00:07:15.759 --> 00:07:18.120
I can now approve them with this data, and yet
139
00:07:18.120 --> 00:07:20.120
we treat them all the same. So yes, this idea
140
00:07:20.160 --> 00:07:26.240
of doing something that we routinely do for our customers.
141
00:07:27.079 --> 00:07:30.360
I mean it is absolutely standard behavior for decades to
142
00:07:30.480 --> 00:07:33.040
say ment customers, to say, what is our least one
143
00:07:33.240 --> 00:07:34.759
is that the same as what James wants? Well, maybe
144
00:07:34.800 --> 00:07:38.360
I can give us something different within my category, and
145
00:07:38.439 --> 00:07:41.199
yet we don't do that for our workers, even though
146
00:07:41.240 --> 00:07:43.439
they're literally the same people, different times of day, different
147
00:07:43.480 --> 00:07:45.920
days of the week, is literally the same people. So
148
00:07:45.959 --> 00:07:50.279
we have all these highly sophisticated product companies selling our
149
00:07:50.279 --> 00:07:54.319
services selling this products or increasingly technology firms selling our
150
00:07:54.319 --> 00:07:56.920
profile and advertisers. Brother, why not they can? We can
151
00:07:56.959 --> 00:07:59.439
always opt out if we want to. Most of us don't.
152
00:08:00.240 --> 00:08:05.319
And yet those firms selling a products, selling our profiles,
153
00:08:05.399 --> 00:08:07.240
they know a lot more about one way to basis
154
00:08:07.560 --> 00:08:09.439
than the films we actually go to work for every day.
155
00:08:09.560 --> 00:08:10.680
Something's really about that.
156
00:08:11.120 --> 00:08:14.759
Wow, that's profound, James, that's really profound. Thanks for sharing that.
157
00:08:14.800 --> 00:08:17.199
I didn't I don't think I had that perspective at all,
158
00:08:17.800 --> 00:08:20.199
even reading your book, I don't think I grab that perspective.
159
00:08:21.040 --> 00:08:23.399
So now we need to talk about something really important, James.
160
00:08:23.680 --> 00:08:26.120
But you and I opened our conversation around because at
161
00:08:26.160 --> 00:08:28.279
first you had some reticence about coming on my on
162
00:08:28.319 --> 00:08:31.800
my podcast, right because you were concerned that we would
163
00:08:31.800 --> 00:08:34.039
only be talking about meaning and purpose and that there
164
00:08:34.039 --> 00:08:36.200
would be an assumption that everyone wants it. And you've
165
00:08:36.200 --> 00:08:39.120
of course discovered that not everyone does want meaning in
166
00:08:39.159 --> 00:08:40.000
purpose in their work.
167
00:08:40.720 --> 00:08:44.360
Yes, and I really appreciate the way you you know,
168
00:08:44.440 --> 00:08:46.879
you responded to my question on that it was extremely
169
00:08:47.519 --> 00:08:51.600
proactive and helpful. So here's here's what I think I've learned. Okay,
170
00:08:51.600 --> 00:08:53.960
and I'm wide open to returns and points of view,
171
00:08:54.039 --> 00:08:56.279
but this is what I've learned from almost fifty thousand
172
00:08:56.320 --> 00:09:00.679
people that we talked to. I wanted to distinguished first
173
00:09:00.720 --> 00:09:03.559
of all, something that is not often not distinguished in
174
00:09:03.600 --> 00:09:06.240
this dialectic, but that is between the purpose and meaning
175
00:09:06.279 --> 00:09:08.879
of the firm, a purpose of meaning for the individual.
176
00:09:10.120 --> 00:09:13.919
So firm meaning of purpose in our research is really important,
177
00:09:14.960 --> 00:09:17.519
no doubt about it. About seventy percent of the people
178
00:09:17.519 --> 00:09:19.879
we talked around the world will probably describe them later
179
00:09:19.919 --> 00:09:23.600
as a very wide rage say that the purpose of
180
00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:25.440
my firm, the meaning, the value, stem whatever I want
181
00:09:25.440 --> 00:09:28.360
to call it, that matters to me. And about half
182
00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:32.679
that number of thirty percent said it's really very important,
183
00:09:32.759 --> 00:09:36.360
particularly when I'm making career decisions. Do I leave, do
184
00:09:36.440 --> 00:09:38.720
I stay, Do I change jobs? Do I stay at
185
00:09:38.720 --> 00:09:41.639
this firm? And that's I mean, that's not everybody, but
186
00:09:41.679 --> 00:09:43.960
that's a good chunk of people. So all the work
187
00:09:43.960 --> 00:09:45.879
that you do, all the work that I've done over
188
00:09:45.960 --> 00:09:49.000
my career. All the work that clients I observe doing
189
00:09:49.120 --> 00:09:53.320
on developing a purpose statement of some sort is very valuable.
190
00:09:53.360 --> 00:09:56.519
I don't want to say anything about that except good,
191
00:09:56.679 --> 00:10:01.360
keep going important. But it is not the case in
192
00:10:01.399 --> 00:10:05.039
our research that individuals are all clamoring for their personal
193
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:08.559
meaning and purpose at work. Some are great. I hope
194
00:10:08.559 --> 00:10:12.159
they find it fantastic. It must be just stupendously satisfying
195
00:10:12.159 --> 00:10:14.279
with them if they do to find a kind of
196
00:10:14.320 --> 00:10:18.039
almost religious experience at work that organized religion used to
197
00:10:18.039 --> 00:10:21.240
provide for many people. That's something that a fascinating book
198
00:10:21.279 --> 00:10:24.480
by Professor Carroll and Chen that Percy explores in Silicon
199
00:10:24.559 --> 00:10:27.360
Valley is sort of approximation of work to religion. But
200
00:10:28.120 --> 00:10:30.759
lots of people three of the archetypes that we're going
201
00:10:30.799 --> 00:10:34.200
to talk about later in particular, are not looking for meaning,
202
00:10:34.240 --> 00:10:36.759
a purpose, or self trelendents or self worth or identity
203
00:10:37.039 --> 00:10:39.519
our work. They're looking for it if they do outside
204
00:10:39.519 --> 00:10:42.279
of work, perhaps in their family, perhaps in faith, perhaps
205
00:10:42.279 --> 00:10:45.200
in sports, I don't know, some other arena is where
206
00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:48.440
they find that in their lives work serves different purposes.
207
00:10:48.600 --> 00:10:51.240
Doesn't mean it's not important, very important, but not that
208
00:10:51.360 --> 00:10:52.960
particular type of importance.
209
00:10:54.399 --> 00:10:57.039
You know, when I was doing my research, James was
210
00:10:57.200 --> 00:10:59.360
again around meaning your work and identity, and I wanted
211
00:10:59.360 --> 00:11:02.879
to understand experience that connection, that relationship between those two,
212
00:11:03.000 --> 00:11:05.279
and I found in the beginning this idea that the
213
00:11:05.320 --> 00:11:08.480
work was detached, their identity was detached from their work.
214
00:11:08.519 --> 00:11:10.840
And so then I found within that different modes that
215
00:11:10.879 --> 00:11:13.200
they could care less about, you know, how their what
216
00:11:13.240 --> 00:11:15.120
their work, and that was like one percent of who
217
00:11:15.120 --> 00:11:17.480
they were. The rest of their life happened outside of work.
218
00:11:18.399 --> 00:11:20.240
So there's so much that we could unpack with this,
219
00:11:20.279 --> 00:11:21.799
and I think it's so important. And one thing I
220
00:11:21.840 --> 00:11:24.360
discovered too, James, is when I would be out doing
221
00:11:24.360 --> 00:11:26.840
workshops on my first the five modes of engagement when
222
00:11:26.879 --> 00:11:28.919
you didn't consider the meaning levels, and then the fifteen
223
00:11:28.960 --> 00:11:31.720
when you did, and people would identify pretty readily which
224
00:11:31.720 --> 00:11:33.519
one was their own. They would be like, you mean
225
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:36.679
people other people experience these other fourteen ways of working.
226
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:41.759
You're keeping me right. It's incredibly illuminating, which I think again,
227
00:11:41.799 --> 00:11:43.360
were I want to get I want to go there.
228
00:11:43.399 --> 00:11:47.399
Next is the opportunity and promise of understanding and embracing
229
00:11:47.399 --> 00:11:50.039
these different architypes that you found to nurture and create
230
00:11:50.080 --> 00:11:53.919
cultures and rewards systems accordingly is vast right. So if
231
00:11:53.960 --> 00:11:55.960
you could sort of speak to a bit about what
232
00:11:56.039 --> 00:11:59.240
you see as that promise, that opening, I see tremendous
233
00:11:59.279 --> 00:11:59.879
promise in that.
234
00:12:01.799 --> 00:12:04.759
I mean, doesn't it always in these systems of typing
235
00:12:04.879 --> 00:12:08.200
start with self knowledge, I think, and you know, and
236
00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:11.240
I forgive anybody whose eyes are rolling at the idea,
237
00:12:11.320 --> 00:12:13.200
oh gosh, another one of these times. You know, what
238
00:12:13.240 --> 00:12:16.320
am I this week? Green donkey this week?
239
00:12:16.360 --> 00:12:16.759
Or what is it?